The Prisoner’s Dilemma and Market Competition – Should Traders Cooperate or Compete?

In the world of game theory, few thought experiments are as famous as the Prisoner’s Dilemma. 

Two prisoners are accused of a crime. If they both stay silent, they receive light sentences. If one betrays the other, the betrayer goes free while the silent one gets a heavy sentence. If they both betray, they both suffer. The logical choice for self-interest often leads to a worse collective outcome.

Markets work in a surprisingly similar way, especially in environments where traders rely on shared liquidity pools or participate in markets with limited transparency.

Liquidity as a Shared Resource

In financial markets, liquidity is like the oxygen everyone breathes. Without it, trades become expensive, spreads widen, and volatility spikes. When traders cooperate, by providing liquidity, avoiding predatory strategies, and maintaining stability, the system stays healthy.

But in reality, the temptation to “defect” is always there. High-frequency traders might exploit momentary imbalances, large players might front-run predictable flows, and coordinated buying or selling might drain liquidity in moments of stress. Short-term personal gain often comes at the expense of long-term market health.

Pump-and-Dump: The Dilemma in Action

Nowhere is the Prisoner’s Dilemma more obvious than in pump-and-dump schemes, whether in shady penny stocks or overly hyped crypto tokens.

• If all early participants “cooperate” and hold, prices might stabilize or rise sustainably.

• But the temptation to “sell early” is overwhelming, because no one wants to be the last holder when the hype collapses.

The result? Most players try to outsmart each other, leading to a race to exit. The collective effect is disastrous; the hype ends quickly, liquidity vanishes, and latecomers take the hit.

Big Fish in the Pond

Large investors: hedge funds, market makers, sovereign wealth funds face similar dilemmas.

• Cooperate: Avoid destabilizing the market, trade gradually, and allow prices to find equilibrium.

• Defect: Push through massive orders to capture immediate advantage, even if it distorts prices.

Just like in the original Prisoner’s Dilemma, the fear that “someone else will strike first” often drives competitive, aggressive behavior, even if it ultimately hurts everyone’s profits.

Lessons for the Individual Trader

While you can’t control the whole market, you can manage your exposure to the dilemma:

1. Avoid over-reliance on illiquid markets 
If the pool is small, a single large player can change the game instantly.

2. Be skeptical of hype-driven moves 
Especially where information is asymmetrical.

3. Diversify sources of liquidity 
Split orders, use multiple venues, and avoid being trapped in a single pool.

4. Think in repeated games 
The market is not a one-off prison cell. Relationships, reputation, and consistency matter.

The Paradox of Cooperation in Markets

The Prisoner’s Dilemma teaches us that while competition is inevitable, strategic cooperation can create better outcomes. This doesn’t mean collusion, it means operating in ways that sustain the market ecosystem you depend on.

In trading, as in the prison cell, winning is not always about beating the other player, sometimes it’s about making sure the game can continue.

Stay up to date by subscribing to my Newsletter.