Price Action and Patterned Noise – Are You Trading Signals or Shadows?

You spot a double bottom. A bull flag. Maybe a breakout from a wedge. You’ve seen this before. You know how it “should” play out. So you trade it. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn’t.

But here’s a question most traders never ask:

What if these patterns don’t mean anything?
What if they’re not signals, but illusions?

Let’s explore the blurry line between market structure and mental projection.

The Comfort of Shapes

Technical analysis is popular because it gives us something solid in a chaotic world. It feels intuitive. Visual. Human. Triangles mean consolidation. Flags mean continuation. Candlestick wicks tell a story. You feel like you’re decoding the market’s language.

But what if you’re not decoding anything?

What if you’re just drawing shapes in noise?

The Pattern Illusion

Humans are pattern-seeking machines. We see faces in clouds. Animals in constellations. Messages in randomness. And we do the same thing with charts. Show a trader a squiggly price line; real or random, and they’ll still spot:

Head and shoulders.
Double tops.
Trendlines.
Channels.

It doesn’t matter if it’s Apple stock or a randomly generated dataset. The brain fills in the blanks. This isn’t technical skill. It’s cognitive bias; apophenia.

Random Walks, Real Patterns?

Here’s something uncomfortable. If you plot a 100% random walk in Python, it’ll still form recognizable price action patterns.

You’ll see resistance being “respected”.

Flags before fake “breakouts”.

Pullbacks to imaginary “support”.

But there are no fundamentals behind the move. No traders. No psychology. No market. Just math. Just randomness. And still… it looks like a chart you’d trade.

The Self-Fulfilling Setup

So why do patterns sometimes “work”? Here’s the twist: sometimes they do. Not because the market is sending signals. But because traders believe in the patterns.

Enough belief = enough volume = a reaction.

A breakout happens not because of the pattern, but because people expected one. Technical analysis becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Until it doesn’t.

The Danger of Retrospective Logic

Most patterns are only obvious after the fact.

We look back and say,

See? That was a perfect double top.

But would you have seen it live? Would you have traded it with conviction? Or are you just connecting dots with hindsight? We confuse explanation with prediction. And that makes us vulnerable.

The Problem of Selective Memory

We remember the patterns that played out beautifully.

We forget the fake-outs, the invalidations, the sideways chop.

It creates a false sense of edge. You’re not tracking statistical outcomes, you’re building a highlight reel. And a highlight reel is not a strategy.

Are You Trading or Storytelling?

When you act on a pattern, ask yourself:

What is this really measuring?
Is this a signal, or just a shape?
Am I trading price… or telling myself a story?

Because if you can’t explain what real market behavior the pattern reflects; you’re not trading, you’re just narrating.

Toward More Grounded Trading

So what can you do? Here are five ways to separate signal from noise:

Back-test Pattern Performance
Quantify how often your setup works, and under what conditions.
Use Random Data as a Test
If your pattern shows up in randomness, be skeptical of its predictive power.
Define the Pattern Mechanism
What is this setup exploiting? Liquidity imbalances? Mean reversion? Volatility compression?
Track Failures, Not Just Wins
Your edge lives in the distribution, not the cherry-picked examples.
Treat Patterns as Probabilistic, Not Prophetic
No pattern guarantees anything. It only suggests a possible outcome.

Final Reflection

The next time you see a clean setup ask,

What am I really seeing here?

Is this a price signal, or a projection of my beliefs? Because in trading, as in life the more you need the pattern to work, the more likely it is that you’re not seeing the market… You’re just seeing your own mind reflected in the chart. And randomness wears many disguises.

Ever seen a “perfect” pattern… in random data? Share your thoughts or chart illusions in the comments.

Stay up to date by subscribing to my Newsletter.